When you are asked to write a response paper, you should write a
succinct (1-2 page) paper offering some critical analysis of the primary
literature we are reading for the week. The model for these papers
is that you are the
reviewer of the paper, determining whether
it requires additional experimentation or should be published as is.
Students should consider their criticisms of the paper in light of
its major conclusions or proposed models. A student concluding the
should be published should discuss how the data support
the specific model proposed by the authors. Those rejecting the paper
should describe how the data fail to support that model.
Subjects of the analysis might include:
Many of these ideas are taken from
Graff, G. & Birkenstein, C. (2009). They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. W. W. Norton.
I. The first paragraph should include a summary of the major findings of the paper. -
II. The next paragraphs should include your criticism(s) of the paper -
III. A final paragraph brings the two sections together (They say, I say, tying it all together), discusses relevance and summarizes your final position.
Some ideas to consider in paper criticism
Note that these are pretty sophisticated. One can start by identifying key experiments and describing how they are confusing or seem to be missing key elements.
Warning! Scientific papers are filled with details and jargon, some of which is critical for understanding the paper. Please use other resources (including other students, TA's, professors, books, the Web) to get a better handle on the material. Don't forget to cite such sources in your response paper! Also, if you get stuck on one figure, skip it and try to work through the rest of the paper. You may find it makes more sense later.
I usually create these pages
on the fly, which means that I rarely
proofread them and they may contain bad grammar and incorrect details.
It also means that I tend to update them regularly (see the history for
more details). Feel free to contact me with any suggestions for changes.
This document was generated by
Siteweaver on Tue Nov 29 12:46:29 2011.
The source to the document was last modified on Thu Aug 25 10:23:03 2011.
This document may be found at
You may wish to validate this document's HTML ; ;Samuel A. Rebelsky, email@example.com
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.