Many of these ideas are taken from
Graff, G. & Birkenstein, C. (2009). They Say, I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. W. W. Norton.
I. The first paragraph should include a summary of the major findings of the paper.
II. The next paragraphs should include your criticism(s) of the paper -
III. A final paragraph brings the two sections together (They say, I say, tying it all together), discusses relevance and summarizes your final position.
Some Ideas to consider in paper criticism
Note that these are pretty sophisticated. One can start by identifying key experiments and describing how they are confusing or seem to be missing key elements.
Warning! Scientific papers are filled with details and jargon, some of which is critical for understanding the paper. Please use other resources (including other students, TA's, professors, books, the Web) to get a better handle on the material. Don't forget to cite such sources in your response paper! Also, if you get stuck on one figure, skip it and try to work through the rest of the paper. You may find it makes more sense later.
on the fly, which means that I rarely
proofread them and they may contain bad grammar and incorrect details.
It also means that I tend to update them regularly (see the history for
more details). Feel free to contact me with any suggestions for changes.
This document was generated by
Siteweaver on Thu Sep 10 21:14:12 2009.
The source to the document was last modified on Thu Aug 27 08:48:19 2009.
This document may be found at
You may wish to validate this document's HTML ; ;Samuel A. Rebelsky, firstname.lastname@example.org
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.